Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.
Suggested Post: have a peek at this website