Question 1

Why is manual testing more important than automation testing?

Accepted Answer

Finding complicated and undetectable flaws is crucial, as manual testing enables testers to employ their human intuition, inventiveness, and inquisitiveness. When test cases are dynamically changing, evaluating the application's user experience is necessary, or when specialized tests cannot be automated effectively, it is advantageous.

Additionally, because manual testing needs less initial investment in automation technologies and resources, it is cost-effective for smaller projects with tighter budgets.

Question 2

Can manual testing and automated testing be used together?

Accepted Answer

Yes, manual testing and automated testing can be used in conjunction with one another to develop a comprehensive and successful testing approach. Companies can benefit from the advantages of each strategy by combining the two ways.

While automated testing is superior at regression testing, repetitive activities, and load testing, manual testing is best for scenarios that call for human intuition, usability testing, and exploratory testing. Businesses can achieve thorough test coverage, ensure improved software quality, and maximize testing efforts by striking the right balance and utilizing the proper testing approach for particular test cases.

manual vs automated testing

Manual vs. Automated Testing: Pros, Cons, and Choosing the Right Mix

manual vs automated testing

Don't Leave Yet!

Are you looking for the perfect partner for your next software project?